4.7 Article

FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab administered weekly or every second week in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II CECOG study

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1769-1777

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt116

Keywords

cetuximab every second week; FOLFOX4; KRAS wild-type; metastatic colorectal cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. CECOG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This randomized phase If study investigated first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab administered every second week in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: Patients received FOLFOX4 plus either standard weekly cetuximab (arm 1) or cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) every second week (arm 2), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (OCR) and safety were also investigated. The study was not powered to establish non-inferiority, but aimed at the estimation of treatment differences. Results: Of 152 randomized eligible patients, 75 were treated in arm 1 and 77 in arm 2; ORRs [53% versus 62%, odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.74-2.66], PFS [median 9.5 versus 9.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% Cl 0.63-1.34], OS (median 25.8 versus 23.0 months, HR 0.86, 95% Cl 0.56-1.30) and OCR (87%) were comparable. HRs adjusted for baseline factors were 1.01 and 0.99 for PFS and OS, respectively. Frequencies of grade 3/4 adverse events in arms 1 versus 2 were similar: most common were neutropenia (28% versus 34%) and rash (15% versus 17%). Conclusions: Activity and safety of FOLFOX4 plus either cetuximab administered weekly or every second week were similar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available