4.5 Article

Identification of cis- and trans-acting factors possibly modifying the risk of epimutations on chromosome 15

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 752-758

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201602

Keywords

Prader-Willi syndrome; Angelman syndrome; imprinting; MTHFR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the majority of patients with a chromosome 15 imprinting defect (ID) causing Prader - Willi syndrome (PWS) or Angelman syndrome ( AS), the defect is a primary epimutation that occurred spontaneously in the absence of a DNA mutation. We have investigated whether common DNA sequence variants in the bipartite imprinting centre (IC) are associated with an increased susceptibility to imprinting defects. We have determined the haplotype structure of the IC and found that the two IC elements called 'PWS-SRO' and 'AS- SRO' lie on separate haplotype blocks. To identify susceptible IC sequence variants, we have used the transmission disequilibrium test. While we did not observe preferential transmission of a paternal allele or haplotype in 41 PWS-ID trios, we found a trend for preferential maternal transmission of one AS-SRO haplotype (H-AS3) in 48 AS-ID trios (P = 0.058) and could identify two sequence variants in H-AS3 that are responsible for this effect. We also obtained tentative evidence that homozygosity for the 677C4T variant of the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase ( MTHFR) gene on chromosome 1 might increase the risk of a maternal imprinting defect: the frequency of the TT genotype was significantly higher in the mothers of the AS patients with an imprinting defect than in the patients' fathers or the general population (P = 0.028). Our findings suggest that women with the IC haplotype H-AS3 or homozygosity for the MTHFR 677C < T variant may have an increased risk of conceiving a child with an imprinting defect, although the absolute risk is low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available