4.7 Article

Phase II study of the HSP90-inhibitor BIIB021 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 252-257

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds275

Keywords

gastro-intestinal stromal tumors; hSP90 inhibitors; phase II trials; pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; sarcoma; soft-tissue malignancies

Categories

Funding

  1. Biogen Idec.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HSP90 inhibition leads to proteosomal degradation of activated KIT and has in vitro activity against gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). BIIB021 is an oral non-ansamycin HSP90 inhibitor. We carried out a phase II study of BIIB021 in patients with GIST refractory to imatinib and sunitinib. The primary end-point was metabolic partial response (mPR) as assessed by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). The secondary end-points were pharmacokinetic assessments of BIIB021 and pharmacodynamic assessments of HSP70. Twenty-three patients were treated on two schedules: 12 pts received 600 mg twice a week (BIW) and 11 patients received 400 mg three times a week (TIW). All had prior imatinib and sunitinib but stopped > 14 days before starting BIIB021. The median age was 59 years (33-88 years), 61% male, 44% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1 (ECOG1). The best response was PR by FDG-PET for five patients (3/12 at 600 mg BIW and 2/9 at 400 TIW) for an overall response rate of 22%. The response duration was 25-138 days. Adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate. The mean C-max was 1.5 mu mol and the mean AUC was 2.9 mu mol h. C-max > 1.5 mu mol was associated with a decrease in standardized uptake value (SUVmax). HSP70 increased substantially following treatment. This study met its primary end-point. BIIB021 leads to objective responses in refractory GIST patients. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed HSP90 inhibition. Further evaluation of BIIB021 in GIST is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available