4.7 Article

The effect of guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): the Pan European Emesis Registry (PEER)

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1986-1992

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds021

Keywords

antiemetic therapy; chemotherapy; emesis; guidelines; nausea

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp.
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ
  3. Abraxis
  4. Amgen
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Bayer Schering
  7. Bristol-Myers
  8. Celgene
  9. Cephalon
  10. GSK
  11. Helsinn
  12. Hospira
  13. Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotech
  14. Merck
  15. MSD
  16. Novartis
  17. Pfizer
  18. Pierre-Fabre
  19. Roche
  20. Sandoz
  21. Schering
  22. sanofi-aventis
  23. Vifor
  24. Merck Co Ltd
  25. Roche UK Ltd
  26. Acacia Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are widely available, clinical uptake of guidelines remains low. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP) on patient outcomes. This prospective, observational multicenter study enrolled chemotherapy-naive adults initiating single-day highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer. Patients completed 6-day daily diaries beginning with cycle 1 for up to three chemotherapy cycles. The primary study end point, complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue therapy) during 120 h after cycle 1 chemotherapy, was compared between GCCP and guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounding factors. In cycle 1 (N = 991), use of GCCP was 55 % and 46 % during acute and delayed phases, respectively, and 29 % for the overall study period (acute plus delayed phases). Complete response was recorded by 172/287 (59.9 % ) and 357/704 (50.7 % ) patients in GCCP and GICP cohorts, respectively (P = 0.008). The adjusted odds ratio for complete response was 1.43 (95 % confidence interval 1.04-1.97; P = 0.027) for patients receiving GCCP versus GICP. GCCP reduces the incidence of CINV after single-day HEC and MEC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available