4.7 Article

Discordance in receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer has a prognostic impact: a single-Institution analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 101-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds248

Keywords

breast cancer; HER2; hormone receptors; discordance; survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health [RF-2009-1472600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor phenotype may change during breast cancer progression. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of receptor discordance between paired primaries and recurrences. One hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent histological sampling of suspected breast cancer recurrence. All the pathology assessments [ER, PgR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] on both primaries and confirmed recurrences were performed at the same laboratory. A breast cancer recurrence was confirmed in 119 cases. Rates of discordance were 13.4%, 39% and 11.8% for ER, PgR and HER2, respectively. Ninety-two patients maintained the same tumor phenotype [i.e. the same hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 status], whereas 27 (22.7%) changed during progression. The loss of HR positivity and the loss of HER2 positivity resulted in a worse post-recurrence survival (P = 0.01 and P = 0.008, respectively) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.06 and P = 0.0002, respectively), compared with the corresponding concordant-positive cases. Tumor phenotype discordance was associated with worse post-recurrence and OS (P = 0.006 and P = 0.002, respectively); those cases who turned into triple-negative experienced the poorest outcome, respect to the concordant group (P = 0.001, OS). We demonstrated for the first time an impact on OS of phenotype discordance between primary breast cancer and relapse. Among discordant cases, receptor loss resulted in the main determinant of poorer outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available