4.8 Article

A new version of 2-tuple. fuzzy linguistic, representation model for computing with words

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 435-445

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.876337

Keywords

computing with words (CW); linguistic modeling; linguistic variables; ordinal modeling; weighted linguistic aggregation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we provide a new (proportional) 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words (CW), which is based on the concept of symbolic proportion.'' This concept motivates us to represent the linguistic information by means of 2-tuples, which are composed by two proportional linguistic terms. For clarity and generality, we first study proportional 2-tuples under ordinal contexts. Then, under linguistic contexts and based on canonical characteristic values (CCVs) of linguistic labels, we define many aggregation operators to handle proportional 2-tuple linguistic information in a computational stage for CW without any loss of information. Our approach for this proportional 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model deals with linguistic labels, which do not have to be symmetrically distributed around a medium label and without the traditional requirement of having equal distance between them. Moreover, this new model not only provides a space to allow a continuous interpolation of a sequence of ordered linguistic labels, but also provides an opportunity to describe the initial linguistic information by members of a continuous linguistic scale domain which does not necessarily require the ordered linguistic terms of a linguistic variable being equidistant. Meanwhile, under the assumption of equally informative (which is defined by a condition based on the concept of CCV), we show that our model reduces to Herrera and Martinez's (translational) 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available