4.5 Article

Hedgehog signaling in small-cell lung cancer:: Frequent in vivo but a rare event in vitro

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 281-290

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.12.014

Keywords

small-cell lung cancer; SCLC; hedgehog signaling pathway; cyclopamine; siRNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hedgehog (HH) signaling pathway plays multiple rotes during embryonic development and increasing evidence suggests that this embryonic pathway is involved in development and progression of several human cancers including those of the brain, skin, lung and gastrointestinal tract. To investigate HH signaling activity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), we have performed gene expression analysis on members of the HH pathway on a panel. of 20 SCLC cell lines. Sonic hedgehog (SHH) expression was detected in only DMS79 and GLC16 and only DMS114 expressed detectable protein levels of GLI1, one of the key transcription factors of the pathway. Involvement of HH signaling in SCLC proliferation was investigated in a subset of cell lines using the HH signaling inhibitor cyclopamine or small interfering RNA (siRNA) against GLI1. Celts expressing GLI1 responded only weakly to both cyclopamine and RNA interference, suggesting that HH signaling plays only a minor rote in the growth of SCLC cell lines. To investigate HH pathway activity in vivo, GLI1 immunohistochemistry was performed on SCLC tumors. Interestingly, GLI1 was expressed in most SCLC tumors studied, indicating that HH signaling is important for in vivo growth of SCLC but establishment of cell tines from SCLC tumors may lead to loss of expression of key HH pathway members. Thus, the data support the idea that the HH pathway may be a therapeutic target in SCLC. However, the data also suggest that the SCLC cells can circumvent the apparent in vivo requirement of HH signaling. (C) 2006 Elsevier Iretand Ltd. All. rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available