4.5 Article

Compression-induced deep tissue injury examined with magnetic resonance imaging and histology

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages 1946-1954

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00889.2005

Keywords

deep pressure ulcers; decubitus; animal model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The underlying mechanisms leading to deep tissue injury after sustained compressive loading are not well understood. It is hypothesized that initial damage to muscle fibers is induced mechanically by local excessive deformation. Therefore, in this study, an animal model was used to study early damage after compressive loading to elucidate on the damage mechanisms leading to deep pressure ulcers. The tibialis anterior of Brown-Norway rats was loaded for 2 h by means of an indenter. Experiments were performed in a magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible loading device. Muscle tissue was evaluated with transverse relaxation time (T2)-weighted MRI both during loading and up to 20 h after load removal. In addition, a detailed examination of the histopathology was performed at several time points (1, 4, and 20 h) after unloading. Results demonstrated that, immediately after unloading, T2-weighted MR images showed localized areas with increased signal intensity. Histological examination at 1 and 4 h after unloading showed large necrotic regions with complete disorganization of the internal structure of the muscle fibers. Hypercontraction zones were found bilateral to the necrotic zone. Twenty hours after unloading, an extensive inflammatory response was observed. The proposed relevance of large deformation was demonstrated by the location of damage indicated by T2-weighted MRI and the histological appearance of the compressed tissues. Differences in damage development distal and proximal to the indenter position suggested a contribution of perfusion status in the measured tissue changes that, however, appeared be to reversible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available