4.4 Article

Elevated maternal cortisol early in pregnancy predicts third trimester levels of placental corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH): Priming the placental clock

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1457-1463

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2005.10.002

Keywords

CRH; cortisol; preterm; pregnancy; stress; HPA

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD28413] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS41298] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purposes of this study were to determine the intervals when placental corticotrophic-releasing hormone (CRH) was most responsive to maternal cortisol. A sample of 203 women each were evaluated at 15, 19, 25 and 31 weeks gestation and followed to term. Placental CRH and maternal adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), B-endorphin and cortisol were determined from plasma. CRH levels increased faster and were higher in women who delivered preterm compared with women who delivered at term (F-3,F-603 = 5.73, p < .001). Simple effects indicated that CRH levels only at 31 weeks predicted preterm birth (F-1,F-201 = 5.53, p = .02). Levels of cortisol were higher in women who delivered preterm at 15 weeks gestation (F-1,F-201 = 4.45, p = .03) with a similar trend at 19 weeks gestation. Hierarchical regression suggested that the influence on birth outcome of maternal cortisol early in pregnancy was mediated by its influence on placental CRH at 31 weeks. Elevated cortisol at 15 weeks predicted the surge in placental CRH at 31 weeks (R = .49, d.f. = 1,199, F-change = 61.78, p <.0001). Every unit of change in cortisol (mu g/dl) at 15 weeks was associated with a 34 unit change of CRH (pg/ml) at 31 weeks. These findings suggested that early detection of stress signals by the placenta stimulated the subsequent release of CRH and resulted in increased risk for preterm delivery. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available