4.7 Article

Trastuzumab decreases the incidence of clinical relapses in patients with early breast cancer presenting chemotherapy-resistant CK-19mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells: results of a randomized phase II study

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1744-1750

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds020

Keywords

trastuzumab; breast cancer; circulating tumor cells; micrometastasis; CK-19; HER2

Categories

Funding

  1. Cretan Association for Biomedical Research (CABR)
  2. Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) which express HER2 is an adverse prognostic factor in early breast cancer patients, we investigated the effect of trastuzumab on patients' clinical outcome. Seventy five women with HER2 (-) breast cancer and detectable CK19 mRNA-positive CTCs before and after adjuvant chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either trastuzumab (n = 36) or observation (n = 39). CK19 mRNA-positive CTCs were detected by RT-PCR and double stained CK(+)/HER2(+) cells by immunofluorescence. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival rate. Fifty-one (89%) of the 57 analyzed patients had HER2-expressing CTCs. After trastuzumab administration, 27 of 36 (75%) women became CK19 mRNA-negative compared to seven of 39 (17.9%) in the observation arm (p = 0.001). After a median follow up time of 67.2 months, four (11%) and 15 (38%) relapses were observed in the trastuzumab and observation arm, respectively (p = 0.008); subgroup analysis indicated that this effect was mainly confined to women with > 3 involved axillary lymph nodes (p = 0.004). The median DFS was also significantly higher for the trastuzumab-treated patients (p = 0.008). Administration of trastuzumab can eliminate chemotherapy-resistant CK19 mRNA-positive CTCs, reduce the risk of disease recurrence and prolong the DFS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available