4.6 Article

Erythropoietin protects the central nervous system during prolonged hypothermic circulatory arrest: An experimental study in a canine model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages 1331-1337

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.035

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Current data suggest that erythropoietin protects the brain and the spinal cord from ischemic and traumatic injury. In this study, we determined whether erythropoietin protects the central nervous system during prolonged hypothermic circulatory arrest in an experimental canine model. Methods: Ten adult beagle dogs were randomly and intravenously injected with either 5000 U/kg recombinant human erythropoietin or normal saline. Each dog was then subjected to a cardiopulmonary bypass and 120 minutes of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest ( 18 C). The level of tau proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid, a modified marker of neurologic deficit in dogs, and the histopathologic characteristics of the brains and spinal cords were then examined. Results: The level of tau proteins was significantly lower in the erythropoietin-treated group than in the untreated group at 6 hours ( 20 +/- 12 vs 144 +/- 54 pg/mL; P =.036) and 12 hours ( 64 +/- 35 vs 478 +/- 103 pg/mL; P =.01) after the operation. The total Neurologic Deficit Score was 59 +/- 31 ( 0, normal; 500, brain death) in the erythropoietin-treated group, compared with 376 +/- 30 in the untreated group ( P =.0117). Histopathologic examination revealed that ischemic neuronal changes and apoptosis in the hippocampus CA1 were significantly lower in the erythropoietin-treated group ( P <.01 and P =.028, respectively). Conclusions: This study showed that erythropoietin protected the central nervous system during prolonged hypothermic circulatory arrest, partly by preventing both necrosis ( ischemic neuronal changes) and apoptosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available