4.6 Article

Fgf9 and Wnt4 act as antagonistic signals to regulate mammalian sex determination

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 1000-1009

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040187

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [MC_U117562207] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U117562207] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U117562207] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NICHD NIH HHS [R37 HD030284, R01 HD039963, HD39963, R37 HD039963, HD30284, R01 HD030284] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genes encoding members of the wingless-related MMTV integration site ( WNT) and fibroblast growth factor ( FGF) families coordinate growth, morphogenesis, and differentiation in many fields of cells during development. In the mouse, Fgf9 and Wnt4 are expressed in gonads of both sexes prior to sex determination. Loss of Fgf9 leads to XY sex reversal, whereas loss of Wnt4 results in partial testis development in XX gonads. However, the relationship between these signals and the male sex-determining gene, Sry, was unknown. We show through gain- and loss-of-function experiments that fibroblast growth factor 9 ( FGF9) and WNT4 act as opposing signals to regulate sex determination. In the mouse XY gonad, Sry normally initiates a feed-forward loop between Sox9 and Fgf9, which up-regulates Fgf9 and represses Wnt4 to establish the testis pathway. Surprisingly, loss of Wnt4 in XX gonads is sufficient to up-regulate Fgf9 and Sox9 in the absence of Sry. These data suggest that the fate of the gonad is controlled by antagonism between Fgf9 and Wnt4. The role of the male sex-determining switch-Sry in the case of mammals-is to tip the balance between these underlying patterning signals. In principle, sex determination in other vertebrates may operate through any switch that introduces an imbalance between these two signaling pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available