4.7 Article

A phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an adenovirus-DLMP1-LMP2 transduced dendritic cell vaccine in patients with advanced metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 997-U8

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr341

Keywords

dendritic cell vaccine; Epstein-Barr virus; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; recombinant adenovirus

Categories

Funding

  1. Singapore Cancer Syndicate [SCS-TS0027]
  2. National Institute of Health [2P01 CA94237]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Individuals with metastatic Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) continue to have poor outcomes. To evaluate the ability of a dendritic cell (DC) vaccine to target subdominant EBV antigens LMP1 and LMP2 expressed by NPC cells, we vaccinated patients using autologous DCs transduced with an adenovirus encoding a truncated LMP1 (Delta LMP1) and full-length LMP2 (Ad-Delta LMP1-LMP2). Materials and methods: Sixteen subjects with metastatic NPC received Ad-Delta LMP1-LMP2 DC vaccines i.d. biweekly for up to five doses. Toxicity, immune responses and clinical responses were determined. Results: Most patients had extensive disease, with a median of three visceral sites of involvement (range 1-7). No significant toxicity was observed. Ad-Delta LMP1-LMP2 DCs induced delayed type hypersensitivity responses in 9 out of 12 patients, but although these DCs activated LMP1/2-specific T cells in vitro, no such increase in the frequency of peripheral LMP1/2-specific T cells was detected. Three patients had clinical responses including one with partial response (for 71/2 months) and two with stable disease (for 61/2 and 71/2 months). Conclusions: Ad-Delta LMP1-LMP2 transduced DCs can be successfully generated and safely administered to patients with advanced NPC. Since efficacy was limited, future studies should focus on DC vaccines with greater potency administered to subjects with less tumor burden.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available