4.6 Article

Probing cosmic chemical evolution with gamma-ray bursts:: GRB 060206 at z=4.048

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 451, Issue 3, Pages L47-L50

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065056

Keywords

gamma rays : bursts; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : abundances; cosmology : observations

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. We present early optical spectroscopy of the afterglow of the gamma-ray burst GRB060206 with the aim of determining the metallicity of the GRB absorber and the physical conditions in the circumburst medium. We also discuss how GRBs may be important complementary probes of cosmic chemical evolution. Methods. Absorption line study of the GRB afterglow spectrum. Results. We determine the redshift of the GRB to be z = 4.04795 +/- 0.00020. Based on the measurement of the neutral hydrogen column density from the damped Lyman-alpha line and the metal content from weak, unsaturated S II lines we derive a metallicity of [S/H] = -0.84 +/- 0.10. This is one of the highest metallicities measured from absorption lines at z similar to 4. From the very high column densities for the forbidden Si II*, O I*, and O I** lines we infer very high densities and low temperatures in the system. There is evidence for the presence of H-2 molecules with log N(H-2) similar to 17.0, translating into a molecular fraction of log f approximate to 3.5 with f = 2N(H-2)/(2N(H-2) + N(H-I)). Even if GRBs are only formed by single massive stars with metallicities below similar to 0.3 Z(circle dot), they could still be fairly unbiased tracers of the bulk of the star formation at z > 2. Hence, metallicities as derived for GRB060206 here for a complete sample of GRB afterglows will directly show the distribution of metallicities for representative star-forming galaxies at these redshifts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available