4.7 Article

Carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients: results from a subset analysis of the CALYPSO phase III trial

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 1185-1189

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr441

Keywords

CALYPSO; carboplatin; paclitaxel; partially platinum-sensitive; pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; ovarian cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck [GCIG006-1a]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To perform a subset analysis of patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) who received either CD [carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)] or CP (carboplatin-paclitaxel) in the CALYPSO trial. CALYPSO, an international phase III, non-inferiority trial, enrolled women with ROC that relapsed > 6 months following first- or second-line therapy. Patients were randomized to CD or CP. Patients with a treatment-free interval of > 6 and < 12 months were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), the primary end point of CALYPSO trial, and safety. A total of 344 partially platinum-sensitive patients were included (N = 161, CD and N = 183, CP). The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.90; P = 0.004 for superiority) in favor of CD. Median PFS times were 9.4 months (CD) and 8.8 months (CP). Toxicities more common with CP versus CD included grade 3/4 neutropenia (50% versus 39%; P = 0.015), grade 2 alopecia (86% versus 9%; P < 0.001), neuropathy and hypersensitivity reactions. Hand-foot syndrome was more common with CD; however, grade 3/4 reactions were low (one patient in each arm). Carboplatin-PLD has a more favorable risk-benefit profile than CP in patients with partially platinum-sensitive ROC and should be considered an effective treatment option for these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available