4.4 Article

The tunicate Salpa thompsoni ecology in the Southern Ocean.: I.: Distribution, biomass, demography and feeding ecophysiology

Journal

MARINE BIOLOGY
Volume 149, Issue 3, Pages 609-623

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-005-0225-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distribution, density, and feeding dynamics of the pelagic tunicate Salpa thompsoni have been investigated during the expedition ANTARKTIS XVIII/5b to the Eastern Bellingshausen Sea on board RV Polarstern in April 2001. This expedition was the German contribution to the field campaign of the Southern Ocean Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Study (SO-GLOBEC). Salps were found at 31% of all RMT-8 and Bongo stations. Their densities in the RMT-8 samples were low and did not exceed 4.8 ind m(-2) and 7.4 mg C m(-2). However, maximum salp densities sampled with the Bongo net reached 56 ind m(-2) and 341 mg C m(-2). A bimodal salp length frequency distribution was recorded over the shelf, and suggested two recent budding events. This was also confirmed by the developmental stage composition of solitary forms. Ingestion rates of aggregate forms increased from 2.8 to 13.9 mu g (pig) ind(-1) day(-1) or from 0.25 to 2.38 mg C ind(-1) day(-1) in salps from 10 to 40 mm oral-atrial length, accounting for 25-75% of body carbon per day. Faecal pellet production rates were on average 0.08 pellet ind(-1) h(-1) with a pronounced diel pattern. Daily individual egestion rates in 13 and 30 mm aggregates ranged from 0.6 to 4.8 mu g (pig) day(-1) or from 164 to 239 mu g C day(-1). Assimilation efficiency ranged from 73 to 90% and from 65 to 76% in 13 and 30 mm aggregates, respectively. S. thompsoni exhibited similar ingestion and egestion rates previously estimated for low Antarctic (similar to 50 degrees S) habitats. It has been suggested that the salp population was able to develop in the Eastern Bellingshausen Sea due to an intrusion into the area of the warm Upper Circumpolar Deep Water

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available