4.7 Article

The efficacy of HER2-targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 1308-1317

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq593

Keywords

chemotherapy; HER2 positive; hormone therapy; meta-analysis; metastatic breast cancer; targeted therapies

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medicine Research Council [568921]
  2. Cancer Institute New South Wales [09/RSA/1-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The addition of HER2-targeted agents to standard treatment has been shown to improve outcomes for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients. We undertook a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in addition to standard treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients and methods: Eligible trials were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the addition of HER2 therapy to standard treatment (hormone or chemotherapy) reporting overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and/or response rates. Results: Eight trials comprising 1848 patients were eligible for inclusion. HER2-targeted agents were trastuzumab and lapatinib and therapeutic partners were taxanes (4 RCTs), anthracyclines (1), capecitabine (2), anastrozole (1) and letrozole (1). The addition of HER2-targeted agents improved OS [hazard ratios (HR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.91], TTP (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.48-0.64), PFS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.53-0.74) and overall response rate (relative risk 1.67; 95% CI 1.46-1.90). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis confirms the benefit of adding HER2-targeted therapy to standard treatment in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. Compared with OS, TTP, PFS and ORR overestimate treatment benefit. Trials in our meta-analysis differed in terms of partner drug or HER2 agents, yet delivered comparable outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available