Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Volumetric CT in Lung Cancer: An Example for the Qualification of Imaging as a Biomarker
Andrew J. Buckler et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2010)
The Use of Volumetric CT as an Imaging Biomarker in Lung Cancer
Andrew J. Buckler et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2010)
Considerations for the Use of Imaging Tools for Phase II Treatment Trials in Oncology
Lalitha K. Shankar et al.
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH (2009)
Automatic segmentation and recognition of lungs and lesion from CT scans of thorax
Manish Kakar et al.
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS (2009)
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. A. Eisenhauer et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2009)
Imaging Surrogates of Tumor Response to Therapy: Anatomic and Functional Biomarkers
Binsheng Zhao et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2009)
Volume CT for Diagnosis of Nodules Found in Lung-Cancer Screening
James L. Mulshine et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2009)
Management of Lung Nodules Detected by Volume CT Scanning
Rob J. van Klaveren et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2009)
Noncalcified Lung Nodules: Volumetric Assessment with Thoracic CT
Marios A. Gavrielides et al.
RADIOLOGY (2009)
Radiologic measurements of tumor response to treatment:: Practical approaches and limitations
Chikako Suzuki et al.
RADIOGRAPHICS (2008)
Effect of nodule characteristics on variability of semiautomated volume measurements in pulmonary nodules detected in a lung cancer screening program
Ying Wang et al.
RADIOLOGY (2008)
Pulmonary nodule volume: Effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements - A phantom study
James G. Ravenel et al.
RADIOLOGY (2008)
Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance
Hester A. Gietema et al.
RADIOLOGY (2007)
Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels
H. Bolte et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2007)
Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology
Myria Petrou et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2007)
Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers
Rebecca M. Lindell et al.
RADIOLOGY (2007)
Lung cancer: Computerized quantification of tumor response - Initial results
Binsheng Zhao et al.
RADIOLOGY (2006)
Measures of response: RECIST, WHO, and new alternatives
C. Carl Jaffe
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2006)
Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria
K Marten et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2006)
Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods
NR Bogot et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2005)
Pulmonary metastases: Effect of CT section thickness on measurement - Initial experience
BS Zhao et al.
RADIOLOGY (2005)
Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility
D Wormanns et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2004)
Volumetric assessment of pulmonary nodules with ECG-gated MDCT
DT Boll et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2004)
Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?
MP Revel et al.
RADIOLOGY (2004)
Pulmonary nodules: Preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation
MP Revel et al.
RADIOLOGY (2004)
Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations
HT Winer-Muram et al.
RADIOLOGY (2003)
Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response
JJ Erasmus et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2003)
Small pulmonary nodules: Volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation
DF Yankelevitz et al.
RADIOLOGY (2000)