4.7 Article

Experimental results and modeling of the osmotic dehydration kinetics of chestnut with glucose solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 324-334

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.002

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osmotic dehydration of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) was carried out using aqueous solutions of glucose of different concentrations (40.0, 50.0 and 56.5% w/w) as osmotic media, and working at three temperatures (25, 35 and 45 degrees C). At different time intervals (up to 8 h) of contact with the osmotic media, total mass, solids gain, water loss and moisture content were determined for each sample. The experimental data modelling was successfully achieved employing an empirical model based on logistic dose response (LDR) curves considering constant dimensions. A model based on Fickian diffusion was also employed with satisfactory results considering the effective coefficient of diffusion constant. Additionally, at the same operating conditions, glucose and moisture contents were obtained for different depths of the samples to determine composition profiles during osmotic dehydration. All the results obtained allow concluding that the osmotic dehydration kinetics depends strongly on glucose concentration and temperature of osmotic media. At higher values for both variables, the water loss and solid acquisition are more intensive. If the water loss/solid gain ratio as a quality parameter of the osmotic operation is analyzed, working at the lowest temperature and the highest concentration assayed the best results (values around 4.2 after 8 h of operation) are obtained. The results on the penetration of osmotic agent indicated that the glucose concentration and the water removal is only significant in the external slabs (4 mm. depth) at 25 degrees C being appreciable concentration gradients present in the product after osmotic dehydration. At higher temperatures, the influence of the osmotic agent is deeper. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available