4.7 Article

Specificity of the peroxisome proliferation response in mussels exposed to environmental pollutants

Journal

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages S117-S123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.02.016

Keywords

peroxisome proliferation; mussels; biomarkers; aquatic pollution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peroxisome proliferation has been proposed as novel biomarker of exposure to organic pollutants in aquatic organisms. Peroxisome proliferator compounds comprise a heterogeneous group of substances known for their ability to cause massive proliferation of peroxisomes and liver carcinogenesis in sensitive species such as rodents. Recently, several marine organisms (mussels and fish) have been shown as target species of peroxisome proliferators. In the present work, we aimed to investigate the specificity of the peroxisome proliferation response in mussels. For this purpose, mussels (Mytilus edulis) were exposed for three weeks to North Sea crude oil (NSO), a mixture of NSO, alkylphenols and extra PAHs (MIX), diallylphthalate (DAP), bisphenol-A (BPA) and tetrabromodiphenyl ether (TBDE), or transplanted for three weeks to four stations showing different copper concentrations in a copper mine. Peroxisome proliferation was assessed by measuring the activity of the peroxisomal P-oxidation enzyme acyl-CoA oxidase (AOX) and the volume density occupied by peroxisomes (V-vp) in the digestive gland. Mussels exposed to NSO and MIX showed significantly increased AOX activities and V-vp compared to control animals. Significantly higher Vvp was also found in DAP and TBDE exposed mussels. V-vp did not vary in mussels transplanted into a copper concentration gradient. Our results confirm the usefulness and specificity of peroxisome proliferation as a suitable biomarker of exposure to organic contaminants such as oil derived hydrocarbons, phthalate plasticizers and polybrominated flame retardants in mussels. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available