4.5 Article

Genetic evidence for the role of loci at 19q13 in cleft lip and palate

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2005.034785

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [D43 TW005503, 5 D43 TW05503] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE011948, R37 DE008559, P50 DE016215, R01 DE 11948, DE 08559, R01 DE008559] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Clefts of the lip and palate are common birth defects, affecting approximately 1 in 700 births worldwide. The aetiology of clefting is complex, with multiple genetic and environmental influences. Methods: Genotype based linkage disequilibrium analysis was conducted using the family based association test (FBAT) and the likelihood ratio test (LRT). We also carried out direct sequencing of the PVR and PVRL2 candidate genes based on their homology to PVRL1, a gene shown previously to cause Margarita Island clefting. Participants included 434 patients with cleft lip with or without cleft palate or cleft palate only and their mothers from eight countries in South America, 205 nuclear triads (father-mother-affected child) from Iowa, 541 nuclear triads from Denmark, and 100 patients with cleft lip and palate from the Philippines. Results: An allelic variant in the PVR gene showed statistically significant association with both South American and Iowa populations (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0009, respectively). Direct sequencing of PVR and PVRL2 yielded 26 variants, including two rare amino acid changes, one in each gene, which were not seen in controls. Conclusions: We found an association between a common variant in a gene at 19q and isolated clefting in two heterogeneous populations. However, it is unclear from our data if rare variants in PVR and PVRL2 are sufficient to cause clefting in isolation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available