4.4 Article

Phase I study of 131I-chimeric(ch) TNT-1/B monoclonal antibody for the treatment of advanced colon cancer

Journal

CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 243-256

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2006.21.243

Keywords

radioimmunotherapy; colon cancer; antibody; clinical trial

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00070] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the biodistribution and toxicity of I-131-chimeric(ch) TNT-1/B monoclonal antibody (MAB), which binds to intracellular antigens of necrotic regions within tumors, in patients with advanced colon or colorectal cancer. The rationale for targeting areas of tumor necrosis is the observation that necrotic lesions are more abundant in cancer lesions than in surrounding tissues. Patients and Methods: Cohorts of patients with advanced colon or colorectal cancer were administered a one-time 30-60-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion of I-131-chTNT-1/B at doses ranging from 12.95 to 66.23 MBq/kg (0.35-1.79 mCi/kg). Results: The dose-limiting toxicity, experienced at 66.23 MBq/kg (1.79 mCi/kg) I-131-chTNT-1/B MAB, was myelosuppression. Two (2) patients at the 66.23-MBq/kg (1.79 mCi/kg) dose level had both grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 neutropenia that persisted for at least 2 weeks but were reversible. The maximum tolerated dose was 58.09 MBq/kg (1.57 mCi/kg) I-131-chTNT-1/B MAR Of the 21 patients, one developed a moderate human antichimeric antibody (HACA) response and 6 developed low HACA responses. Conclusions: The infusion of I-131-chTNT-1/B MAB was well tolerated, without significant nonhematological toxicity. No patient obtained a complete or partial response, based on tumor cross-product response criteria. Tumor localization was seen in patients with dose levels at, and exceeding, 50.23 MBq/kg (1.36 mCi/kg) I-131-chTNT-1/B MAB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available