4.7 Article

Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and significant comorbidity

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 132-138

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq316

Keywords

Charlson comorbidity index; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; patient selection; stage III NSCLC; toxicity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Published trials of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) generally excluded patients with significant comorbidity. We evaluated outcomes in patients who were selected by using radiation planning parameters and were considered, despite comorbidity, fit enough to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients and methods: From 2003 to 2008, 89 patients with stage III NSCLC fit to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy and a V(20) < 42% underwent CCRT at one center outside clinical trials. Most received one cycle of cisplatin-gemcitabine, followed by two to three cycles of cisplatin-etoposide concurrent with involved-field thoracic radiotherapy between 46 and 66 Gy. Results: Median age was 64 years; performance status (PS) of zero, one or two in 20/64/5 patients; one or more comorbidities in 41.6%; 14% were treated previously for NSCLC. Median V20 was 26.6% (range 4%-39.4%). Grade III esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in 28.1% and 7.9% of patients, respectively, while 4.5% died during treatment. Median overall survival was 18.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.1-23.3 months]. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were PS (0 versus >= 1, P = 0.041) and planning target volume (P = 0.022). Conclusions: Patients with significant comorbidity who are fit to undergo cisplatin-based CCRT achieve median survivals similar to that reported in phase III trials and with relatively few late toxic effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available