4.7 Article

Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype, RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT)

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 942-948

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp407

Keywords

brain metastasis; HER2-positive breast cancer; RPA RTOG prognostic class; systemic treatment; triple-negative breast cancer; whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Materials and methods: The group of 222 breast cancer patients with brain metastasis was divided into three biological subgroups. The propensity of biological subtypes for metastases to the brain and survivals depending on biological subtype, recursive partitioning analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RPA RTOG) prognostic class and the use of systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy were assessed. Results: The rate of patients with triple-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and luminal breast cancer with brain metastases was 28%, 53% and 19%, respectively. Median survival from brain metastases in triple-negative, HER2-positive and luminal subtype was 3.7, 9 and 15 months, respectively. Median survival from brain metastases in RPA RTOG prognostic class I, II and III was 15, 11 and 3 months, respectively. In the luminal and in the triple-negative subtype, systemic therapy prolonged survival from 3 to 14 months and from 3 to 4 months, respectively. In HER2-positive subtype, median survival without further treatment, after chemotherapy and after chemotherapy with targeted therapy were 3, 8 and 11 months, respectively. Conclusions: HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancers have special predilection for metastases to the brain. Survival from brain metastases depended on performance status and the use of systemic treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available