4.7 Article

Phase II study of sunitinib in men with advanced prostate cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 913-920

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp111

Keywords

angiogenesis; castration; docetaxel; PSA; resistant

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program Clinical Trial Award [PC-050010]
  2. NIH K24 Midcareer Investigator Award [5K24CA121990-02]
  3. Prostate Cancer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study explored the efficacy and tolerability of sunitinib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinase receptors, in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods: Men with no prior chemotherapy (group A) and men with docetaxel (Taxotere)-resistant prostate cancer (group B) were treated with sunitinib. The primary end point was confirmed 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline. Secondary end points included objective response rate and safety. Serum-soluble biomarkers were measured. Results: Seventeen men were enrolled in each group. One confirmed PSA response was observed in each group, and an additional eight men and seven men had stable PSA at week 12 in groups A and B, respectively. Improvements in imaging were observed in the absence of post-treatment PSA declines. Common adverse effects included fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, myelosuppression and transaminase elevation. Significant changes following sunitinib treatment were observed in serum-soluble biomarkers including soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, platelet-derived growth factor aa, placental growth factor and leptin. Conclusions: Sunitinib monotherapy resulted in few confirmed 50% post-treatment declines in PSA in men with CRPC. Serum markers of angiogenesis confirmed on-target effects of sunitinib. Assessments of radiographic disease status were often discordant with changes in PSA, indicating that alternate end points are important in future trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available