4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Primary care provider concerns about management of chronic pain in community clinic populations

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 652-655

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00412.x

Keywords

pain; primary care; vulnerable populations; physician satisfaction; medical education

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [1 R03 HS013455-01A1., R03 HS013455] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a common patient complaint in primary care, yet providers and patients are often dissatisfied with treatment processes and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess provider satisfaction with their training for and current management of chronic pain in community clinic settings. To identify perceived problems with delivering chronic pain treatment and issues with opioid prescribing for chronic pain. DESIGN. Mailed survey to primary care providers (PCPs) at 8 community clinics. RESULTS: Respondents (N= 111) included attendings, residents, and nurse practioners (NPs)/physician assistants (PAs). They reported 37.5% of adult appointments in a typical week involved patients with chronic pain complaints. They attributed problems with pain care and opioid prescribing more,often to patient-related factors such as lack of self-management, and potential for abuse of medication than to provider or practice system factors. Nevertheless, respondents reported inadequate training for, and low satisfaction with, delivering chronic pain treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of adult primary care appointments involve patients with chronic pain complains. Dissatisfaction with training and substantial concerns about patient self-management and about opioid prescribing suggest areas for improving medical education and postgraduate training. Emphasis on patient-centered approaches to chronic pain management, including skills for assessing risk of opioid abuse and addiction, is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available