3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Epigenetic events of disease progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages 668-677

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.132.6.668

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE015990, R01 DE 15990] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the promoter methylation status of the 22 cancer genes and their contribution to disease progression in 6 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines. Design: A panel of 41 gene probes, designed to interrogate 35 unique genes with known associations to cancer including HNSCC, was interrogated for alterations in gene copy number and aberrant methylation status (22 genes) using the methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay. Subjects: Primary (A) and recurrent or metastatic (B) HNSCC cell lines UMSCC-11A/11B, UMSCC-17A/17B, and UMSCC-81A/81B are described. Results: Nine genes, TIMP3, APC, KLK10, TP73, CDH13, IGSF4, FHIT, ESR1, and DAPK1, were aberrantly methylated. The most frequently hypermethylated genes were APC and IGSF4, observed in 3 of 6 cell lines, and TP73 and DAPK1, observed in 2 of 6. For KLK10 and IGSF4, TIMP3 and FHIT, and TP73, in UMSCC-11B, UMSCC-17B, and UMSCC-81B, respectively, promoter hypermethylation was a disease progression event, indicating complete abrogation of tumor suppressor function for KLK10, IGSF4, and TIMP3 and gene silencing of 1 of 2 copies of TP73. Hypermethylation of IGSF4, TP73, CDH13, ESR1, DAPK1, and APC were primary events in UMSCC-17A. Conclusions: Gene silencing through promoter hypermethylation was observed in 5 of 6 cell lines and contributed to primary and progressive events in HNSCC. In addition to genetic alterations of gains and losses, epigenetic events appear to further undermine a destabilized genomic repertoire in HNSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available