Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas:: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60)
Michael Pfreundschuh et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2008)
Intensified 12-week CHOP (I-CHOP) plus G-CSF compared with standard 24-week CHOP (CHOP-21) for patients with intermediate-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3 trial of the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON)
Leo F. Verdonck et al.
BLOOD (2007)
CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma:: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group
Michael Pfreundschuh et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2006)
Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas:: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL
M Pfreundschuh et al.
BLOOD (2004)
Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas:: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL
M Pfreundschuh et al.
BLOOD (2004)
Report of an International Network of Cancer Treatment and Research workshop on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in developing countries
KN Naresh et al.
BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES (2004)
Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma
H Tilly et al.
BLOOD (2003)
CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment:: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial
E Ösby et al.
BLOOD (2003)
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
JPT Higgins et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.
B Coiffier et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2002)
A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis
P Macaskill et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2001)
Share Paper
