4.7 Article

Circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts as intermediate end points in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): a single-centre experience

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 27-33

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn544

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ESMO fellowship for Circulating Tumor Cell Research in Prostate Cancer
  2. MRC [G0501019] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Cancer Research UK [10588] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0501019] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2008-22-001] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts, before and after commencing treatment, with overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Experimental design: A 7.5 ml of blood was collected before and after treatment in 119 patients with CRPC. CTCs were enumerated using the CellSearch (R) System. Results: Higher CTC counts associated with baseline characteristics portending aggressive disease. Multivariate analyses indicated that a CTC >= 5 was an independent prognostic factor at all time points evaluated. Patients with baseline CTC >= 5 had shorter OS than those with < 5 [median OS 19.5 versus > 30 months, hazard ratio (HR) 3.25, P = 0.012]; patients with CTC > 50 had a poorer OS than those with CTCs 5-50 (median OS 6.3 versus 21.1 months, HR 4.1, P < 0.001). Patients whose CTC counts reduced from >= 5 at baseline to < 5 following treatment had a better OS compared with those who did not. CTC counts showed a similar, but earlier and independent, ability to time to disease progression to predict OS. Conclusion: CTC counts predict OS and provide independent prognostic information to time to disease progression; CTC dynamics following therapy need to be evaluated as an intermediate end point of outcome in randomised phase III trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available