4.7 Article

Growth inhibition and differentiation of human breast cancer cells by the PAFR antagonist WEB-2086

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 1637-1642

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603156

Keywords

breast cancer; differentiation; growth arrest; WEB-2086; MCF-7; MDA-MB-231

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

WEB-2086 - an antagonist of platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) with known anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic and antileukaemic properties - also proved to inhibit the proliferation in human solid tumour cell lines of different histology, and with much higher efficacy than in normal fibroblasts. A detailed analysis of WEB-2086 anticancer activity was then performed focusing on breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. WEB-2086-treated cells, either expressing (MCF-7) or unexpressing (MD-AMB-231) the oestrogen receptor (ER) a, underwent a dose-dependent growth arrest (IC50 = 0.657 +/- 0.09 and 0.41 +/- 70.07 mM, respectively) and accumulation in G(0)-G(1) phase. WEB-2086 also induced morphological and functional changes typical of mature mammary phenotype including (i) cell enlargement and massive neutral lipid deposition (best accomplished in MCF-7 cells); (ii) decrease in motility and active cathepsin D levels (mainly observed in highly invasive MDA-MB-231 cells). The expression of ER alpha was neither increased nor reactivated in treated MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. WEB-2086-induced differentiation in breast cancer cells involved the upregulation of PTEN, a key tumour suppressor protein opposing tumorigenesis, and was apparently independent of p53, PAFR, peripheral benzodiazepine receptor and ERa status. Overall, WEB-2086 can be proposed as an effective antiproliferative and differentiative agent with interesting translational opportunities to treat breast cancers in support to conventional chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available