4.8 Article

Decoding seen and attended motion directions from activity in the human visual cortex

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1096-1102

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY014202, R01-EY14202] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P50-MH62196, P50 MH062196] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional neuroimaging has successfully identified brain areas that show greater responses to visual motion [1-3] and adapted responses to repeated motion directions [4-6]. However, such methods have been thought to lack the sensitivity and spatial resolution to isolate direction-selective responses to individual motion stimuli. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and pattern classification methods [7-10] to show that ensemble activity patterns in human visual cortex contain robust direction-selective information, from which it is possible to decode seen and attended motion directions. Ensemble activity in areas V1-V4 and MT+N5 allowed us to decode which of eight possible motion directions the subject was viewing on individual stimulus blocks. Moreover, ensemble activity evoked by single motion directions could effectively predict which of two overlapping motion directions was the focus of the subject's attention and presumably dominant in perception. Our results indicate that feature-based attention can bias direction-selective population activity in multiple visual areas, including MT+N5 and early visual areas (V1-V4), consistent with gain-modulation models of feature-based attention and theories of early attentional selection. Our approach for measuring ensemble direction selectivity may provide new opportunities to investigate relationships between attentional selection, conscious perception, and direction-selective responses in the human brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available