4.7 Article

Temsirolimus safety profile and management of toxic effects in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and poor prognostic features

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 1387-1392

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn066

Keywords

interferon; mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR); renal cell carcinoma; safety; temsirolimus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Temsirolimus, a novel inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, has demonstrated prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with interferon alfa (IFN) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and poor prognostic features. Adverse events (AEs) of any causality were previously reported, but AEs that were deemed temsirolimus related are of particular relevance for poor-risk patients and for defining mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-specific side-effects. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced RCC, no prior systemic therapy, and three or more of six poor-risk factors were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (i) IFN s.c. up to 18 MU thrice weekly, (ii) temsirolimus i.v. 25 mg weekly, or (iii) temsirolimus i.v. 15 mg weekly plus interferon s.c. 6 MU thrice weekly. Results: Among 208 patients, the most common temsirolimus-related grades 3-4 AEs were anemia (13%), hyperglycemia (9%), and asthenia (8%). Grades 3-4 hypercholesterolemia (1%), hypertriglyceridemia (3%), and hypophosphatemia (4%) were also seen. Although pneumonitis occurred infrequently, vigilance for its development is needed. Guidelines for management of toxic effects are presented on the basis of available clinical experience. Conclusions: Temsirolimus-related grades 3-4 AEs were primarily metabolic in nature and easily controlled medically. In general, these did not negatively impact patient quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available