4.5 Article

The effects of unilateral eighth nerve block on fictive VOR in the turtle

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1094, Issue -, Pages 149-162

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.121

Keywords

nerve recording; nerve block; abducen; trochlear; oculomotor; in vitro

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [F32EY016956] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC-03894, R01 DC003834-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiunit activity during horizontal sinusoidal motion was recorded from pairs of oculomotor, trochlear, or abducens nerves of an in vitro turtle brainstem preparation that received inputs from intact semicircular canals. Responses of left oculornotor, right trochlear and right abducens nerves were approximately aligned with leftward head velocity, and that of the respective contralateral nerves were in-phase with rightward velocity. We examined the effect of sectioning or injecting lidocaine (1-2 mu L of 0.5%) into the right vestibular nerve. Nerve block caused a striking phase shift in the evoked response of right oculomotor and left trochlear nerves, in which (rightward) control responses were replaced by a smaller-amplitude response to leftward table motion. Such phase-reversed responses were poorly defined in abducens nerve recordings. Frequency analysis demonstrated that this activity was advanced in phase relative to post-block responses of the respective contralateral nerves, which were in turn phase-advanced relative to pre-block controls. Phase differences were largest (similar to 10 degrees) at low frequencies (similar to 0.1 Hz) and statistically absent at 1 Hz. The phase-reversed responses were further investigated by eliminating individual canal input from the left labyrinth following right nVIII block, which indicated that the activation of the vertical canal afferents is the source of this activity. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available