4.8 Article

Overview of the development of CO-tolerant anode electrocatalysts for proton-exchange membrane fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 157, Issue 1, Pages 128-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.08.010

Keywords

proton-exchange membrane fuel cell; carbon monoxide tolerance; hydrogen oxidation; platinum catalyst; Pt-Ru anode; selective carbon dioxide oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poisoning of Pt anode electrocatalysts by carbon monoxide (CO) is deemed to be one of the most significant barriers to be overcome in the development of proton-exchange membrane fuel cell systems (PEMFCs). The use of CO-tolerant electrocatalysts serves as the most hopeful way to solve this problem. It is well established that Pt-based alloy systems of CO-tolerant electrocatalysts can substantially withstand the presence of CO in the fuel stream. Based on literature starting in 2000, a few efforts have still been conducted at developing a more CO-tolerant anode electrocatalyst than the traditional Pt/C or PtRu/C systems. This review introduces and discusses these efforts. Pt-based electrocatalysts, including PtSn/C, PtMo/C (atomic ratio = 5:1), PtRuMo/C (Mo = 10 wt.%), PtRu-HMoO3/C and PtRu/(C nanotubes), appear to be poisoned by CO at the same, or a lower, level than traditional Pt/C or PtRu/C electrocatalysts. Platinum-free electrocatalysts, such as PdAu/C, have proven to be less strongly poisoned by CO than PtRu/C counterparts at temperatures of 60 degrees C. A greater tolerance to CO can be achieved by modifying the structure of the electrocatalyst. This involves the use of a composite or double-layer that is designed to make the CO react with one of the electrocatalyst in advance while the main hydrogen reacts at another layer with a traditional Pt/C electrocatalyst. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available