4.7 Article

The mass-metallicity relation at z≥2

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 644, Issue 2, Pages 813-828

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/503623

Keywords

galaxies : abundances; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : high-redshift

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use a sample of 87 rest-frame UV-selected star-forming galaxies with mean spectroscopic redshift < z > = 2.26 +/- 0.17 to study the correlation between metallicity and stellar mass at high redshift. Using stellar masses determined from SED fitting to observed 0.3-8 mu m photometry, we divide the sample into six bins in stellar mass and construct six composite H alpha + [N II] spectra from all of the objects in each bin. We estimate the mean oxygen abundance in each bin from the [N II]/H alpha ratio and find a monotonic increase in metallicity with increasing stellar mass, from 12 + log (O/H) < 8.2 for galaxies with < M-star > = 2.7 x 10(9) M-circle dot to 12 + log (O/H) = 8.6 for galaxies with < M-star > = 1.0 x 10(11) M-circle dot. We use the empirical relation between SFR density and gas density to estimate the gas fractions of the galaxies, finding an increase in gas fraction with decreasing stellar mass. These gas fractions, combined with the observed metallicities, allow the estimation of the effective yield y(eff) as a function of stellar mass; in constrast to observations in the local universe, which show a decrease in y(eff) with decreasing baryonic mass, we find a slight increase. Such a variation of metallicity with gas fraction is best fitted by a model with supersolar yield and an outflow rate similar to 4 times higher than the SFR. We conclude that the mass-metallicity relation at high redshift is driven by the increase in metallicity as the gas fraction decreases through star formation and is likely modulated by metal loss from strong outflows in galaxies of all masses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available