4.3 Article

Comparative Effect of Green Tea, Chokeberry and Honeysuckle Polyphenols on Nutrients and Mineral Absorption and Digestibility in Rats

Journal

ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 163-169

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000278747

Keywords

Polyphenols; Polyphenols, biological properties; Polyphenols, digestibility in rats; Chokeberry extract; Green tea extract

Funding

  1. State Committee for Scientific Research [3 P06T 046 24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Natural polyphenols are chemically and biologically active. This study aimed at examining the physiological effects of high doses of polyphenol extracts from green tea and new polyphenol-rich sources (chokeberry and honeysuckle fruits) on nutrient absorption. Methods: 32 male Wistar rats were divided into four groups and fed a diet supplemented with one of the three polyphenolic extracts (at 0.4%) or a control diet for 4 weeks. A perfusion technique was used to study the effects at intestinal level. Pure polyphenols from the three sources were introduced into perfusion fluid at a concentration of 0.4% and allowed to cross the intestinal tract in 1.5 h. Results: In the perfusion experiment, addition of the extracts caused a strong and statistically significant reduction in absorption of the selected nutrients (water, glucose, cholesterol, amino acids and minerals) compared to control animals. In the nutritional experiment, we recorded a slight decrease in diet utilization and growth in rats on polyphenolic diets relative to control group. In the same experiment, we observed a reduction of Zn and Cu absorption, but this was not accompanied by diminished concentrations in the bone femur. Conclusions: The presence of the polyphenolic extracts in the perfusion liquids significantly reduced absorption from the small intestine, but the nutritional experiment did not confirm deleterious consequences of the consumption of high extract doses. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available