4.7 Article

Value of 123I-MIBG radioactivity in the differential diagnosis of DLB from AD

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 12, Pages 1850-1854

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219640.59984.a7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic reliability of cardiac iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (I-123-MIBG) radioactivity in discriminating dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from Alzheimer disease ( AD) regardless of parkinsonism. Background: The diagnosis of DLB may be confounded by the absence of parkinsonism. This highlights the need to improve the accuracy of antemortem diagnosis of DLB without parkinsonism. Methods: Cardiac sympathetic denervation was examined using myocardial I-123-MIBG scintigraphy in 37 patients with DLB, 42 patients with AD, and 10 normal elderly controls. The DLB patients consisted of seven patients without parkinsonism (DLB/P-) and 30 patients with parkinsonism (DLB/P-) at the time of the study. Results: The heart-to-mediastinum uptake ratio (H/M ratio) of myocardial MIBG uptake was decreased in both the DLB groups vs the AD group (p < 0.0001) and control group (p < 0.0001). The washout rate (WR) was higher in the DLB group than in the control group (p < 0.0001) and AD group (p < 0.0001). No differences were found between the AD and control groups or between the DLB/P+ and DLB/P+ groups in either the early or delayed H/M ratio or WR. In discriminating between DLB and AD, regardless of parkinsonism, the delayed H/M ratio had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, and a positive predictive value of 100% at a cutoff value of 1.68. Conclusions: Our results indicate that dementia with Lewy bodies results in cardiac sympathetic denervation and that iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy is a sensitive tool for discriminating dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer disease even in patients without parkinsonism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available