4.7 Article

Synthesis and crystallization kinetics of silsesquioxane-based hybrid star poly(ε-caprolactone)

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 47, Issue 14, Pages 5161-5173

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.062

Keywords

star polymer; crystallization; DSC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of silsesquioxane-based hybrid star poly(epsilon-caprolactone) with different arm length (SHPCL-4, SHPCL-10, SHPCL-40) were synthesized from ring-opening polymerisation of epsilon-caprolactone as a monomer initiated by silsesquioxane-based hybrid polyol (SBOH). Two linear poly(epsilon-caprolactone)s, LPCL-25 and LPCL-35, were also prepared for comparison. The sequence of LPCL-25 < LPCL-35 < SHPCL-4 < SHPCL-10 SHPCL-40 for total molecular weights (M-n) and the sequence of SHPCL-4 < SHPCL-10 < LPCL-25 < LPCL-35 < SHPCL-40 for (MNMR) average molecular weight per arm (M-arm(NMR)) were determined by H-1 NMR and GPC measurements. The H-1 NMR data also suggested that SHPCLs possess a spheric architecture with 29.2 arms in average. The crystallization kinetics study by non-isothermal DSC showed that the starting temperature of crystallization (T-s) the ending temperature (T-c) and the peak temperature of exothennic curve (T-p) are in the order as: SHPCL-4 < SHPCL-10 < LPCL-25 < SHPCL-40 approximate to LPCL-35, while the crystallinity (X-c) follows the order of SHPCL-4 < SHPCL-10 < SHPCL-40 < LPCL25 < LPCL-35. The corrected overall crystallization rate constant (K-c) calculated from Avrami equation were found to be in the order as: SHPCL-4 < SHPCL-10 < LPCL-35 < LPCL-25 = SHPCL-40, which was further evidenced by the real time morphological observation with polarized light microscopy (POM). It is also found by the POM measurements that the inorganic core and star architecture greatly retards the nucleation of SHPCLs with short arms, while it helps the nucleation of SHPCL with longer arms. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available