4.7 Article

Stable isotope and trace element profiling combined with classification models to differentiate geographic growing origin for three fruits: Effects of subregion and variety

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 54, Issue 13, Pages 4506-4516

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf0600455

Keywords

geographic authenticity; principal component analysis; canonical discriminant analysis; elemental analysis; stable isotope; strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa); blueberry (Vaccinium caesariense/corymbosum; pear (Pyrus communis); geographic origin; food labeling; linear discriminant function; quadratic discriminant function; hierarchal tree; neural network; genetic neural network; modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Classifications of geographic growing origin of three fresh fruits combining elemental profiles with various modeling approaches were determined. Elemental analysis (Ca, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, V, and Zn) of strawberry, blueberry, and pear samples was performed using inductively coupled plasma argon atomic emission spectrometer. Bulk stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses in pear were performed using mass spectrometry as an alternative fingerprinting technique. Each fruit, strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa), blueberry ( Vaccinium caesariense/corymbosum), and pear ( Pyrus communis), was analyzed from two growing regions: Oregon vs Mexico, Chile, and Argentina, respectively. Principal component analysis and canonical discriminant analysis were used for data visualization. The data were modeled using linear discriminant function, quadratic discriminant function, neural network, genetic neural network, and hierarchical tree models with successful classification ranging from 70 to 100% depending on commodity and model. Effects of Oregon subregional and variety classification were investigated with similar success rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available