4.4 Article

Comparison of exogenous glucose, fructose and galactose oxidation during exercise using 13C-labelling

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 56-61

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1079/BJN20061799

Keywords

stable isotope; exogenous hexoses; calorimetry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Six subjects exercised for 120 min on a cycle ergometer (65 (se 3) % V.(O2max)) when ingesting a placebo or glucose, fructose or galactose (100 g in 1000 ml water) labelled with C-13. The oxidation of energy substrates including exogenous hexoses was compared using indirect respiratory calorimetry and (CO2)-C-13 production at the mouth. Total carbohydrate progressively decreased and total fat oxidation increased over the 120 min exercise period in the four experimental situations. During the 120 min of exercise, the amount of fructose oxidized (38 center dot 8 (se 2 center dot 6) g; 9 center dot 0 (se 0 center dot 6) % energy yield) was not significantly (approximately 4 %) lower than that of exogenous glucose (40 center dot 5 (se 3 center dot 4) g; 9 center dot 2 (se 0 center dot 8) % energy yield), while that of galactose (23 center dot 7 (se 3 center dot 5) g; 5 center dot 5 (se 0 center dot 9) % energy yield) was only 59 % and 61 % that of glucose and fructose, respectively. When compared with the placebo, the ingestion and oxidation of the three hexoses did not significantly modify fat oxidation or total carbohydrate oxidation, but it significantly reduced (9-13 %) endogenous carbohydrate oxidation. The present data indicate that fructose and exogenous glucose ingested during exercise could be oxidized at a similar rate, but that the oxidation rate of galactose was only approximately 60 % that of the exogenous glucose and fructose, presumably because of a preferential incorporation of galactose into liver glycogen (Leloir pathway). The reduction in endogenous carbohydrate oxidation was, however, similar with the three hexoses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available