4.2 Article

Iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging can predict future cardiac events in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 679-686

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-010-0409-3

Keywords

Cardiac imaging; Sympathetic nervous system; Washout rate; Preserved ejection fraction

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology [19790513, 21590923, 21790700, 21790701]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21790701, 21790700, 19790513] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (I-123-MIBG) has been used to assess the function of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The usefulness of I-123-MIBG imaging for evaluating patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) has not been established. We performed I-123-MIBG scintigraphy and echocardiography and measured the plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels of 117 consecutive HF patients (64 men, mean age 66 +/- A 14 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of a parts per thousand yen50% who were admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. The I-123-MIBG delayed heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratio was significantly lower, and the washout rate (WR) was higher in patients with HFPEF with advanced NYHA functional class (NYHA functional class I and II vs. III: 1.90 +/- A 0.34 vs. 1.49 +/- A 0.32, p < 0.0001; 25.9 +/- A 13.4 vs. 46.9 +/- A 16.3%, p < 0.0001, respectively). On the other hand, the I-123-MIBG WR was not correlated with LVEF and had a weak correlation with plasma BNP levels (R = 0.207, p = 0.0346). Moreover, patients with a high I-123-MIBG WR showed a poor clinical outcome (p = 0.0033). I-123-MIBG imaging provides independent prognostic information in patients with HFPEF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available