4.6 Article

Adenovirus delivery provides extended interferon-α exposure and augments treatment of metastatic carcinoma

Journal

CANCER GENE THERAPY
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 664-675

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700942

Keywords

interferon-alpha; hybrid-interferon; antitumor efficacy; 4T1 mammary carcinoma; metastasis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type I interferons (e.g. IFN alpha 2b) have been successfully used to treat a variety of hematological malignancies, but have not been efficacious for treatment of most solid tumors. We tested the hypothesis that delivery of type I interferon utilizing recombinant adenovirus (rAd) vectors may improve treatment efficacy of metastatic carcinomas by providing increased interferon exposure resulting from continuous transgene expression. Treatment of mice with a rAd-vector expressing hybrid-IFN (rAd-IFN alpha 2 alpha 1) inhibited 4T1 mammary carcinoma tumor growth and induced tumor regression in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, rAd-IFNa2a1 treatment reduced hepatic and pulmonary metastatic burden. A comparison of local and systemic routes of administration demonstrated that intratumoral delivery of rAd-IFN alpha 2 alpha 1 was sufficient for inhibition of tumor growth. Moreover, it reduced toxicity associated with high-dose systemic IFN alpha 2 alpha 1 exposure. Interestingly, antitumor activity following intratumoral treatment was due, in part, to the immunostimulatory capacity of the rAd vector component. Furthermore, systemic administration of rAd-IFN alpha 2 alpha 1 potentiated the immunotherapeutic effect induced by local intralesional delivery of empty-rAd vector. These results suggest continuous interferon-a exposure may provide improved antitumor responses for metastatic carcinomas. Additionally, immunostimulatory responses induced by rAd-IFN alpha 2 alpha 1 may mitigate the immune- evasive tumor microenvironment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available