4.2 Article

Does caffeine modify corticomotor excitability?

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2006.08.005

Keywords

caffeine; adenosine; transcranial magnetic stimulation; cortical excitability; cortical silent period

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. - To test the influence of caffeine on the Lower and upper motor neuron excitability. Methods. - In Experiment A, 18 healthy subjects received 200 mg of caffeine or placebo, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control led design protocol. Mean F-waves amplitude, amplitude of the motor response evoked by magnetic stimulation (MEP), MEP duration, cortical silent period (CSP), central conduction time, and cortical threshold were evaluated. In Experiment B, 6 healthy controls received 400 mg of caffeine, the peripheral silent period (PSP) and CSP were evaluated. CSP was recorded bilaterally in biceps brachii (intensity 10% above threshold) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) (intensity at 10% and 50% above threshold). Muscle contraction was above 50% of the maximum force in both experiments. Latencies were defined by a technician who was not aware of this investigation. Serum caffeine level was evaluated. Results. - In Experiment A, only the CSP, recorded in both ADM with intensity at 10% above threshold showed a significant change after caffeine (decrease of 17.1 +/- 34.0 ms, about 12% reduction). In Experiment B, PSP did not change, but CSP tested with intensities 10% above threshold was significantly decreased by 20.8 +/- 34.4 ms in ADM and 13.5 +/- 13.8 ms in biceps (about 13 and 16%, respectively). Serum caffeine level clearly increased after consumption but no correlation could be found between these levels and CSP reduction. Conclusions. - In our investigation, caffeine elicited a consistent decrease of the CSP, suggesting that caffeine increases cortical neuronal excitability. (c) 2006 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available