4.7 Article

Efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone: A multicenter clinical trial

Journal

ONCOLOGIST
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 841-848

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-7-841

Keywords

zoledronic acid; bisphosphonates; breast cancer; bone metastases

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in breast cancer patients with newly diagnosed bone metastases. Materials and Methods. Patients diagnosed with bone metastases <= 6 weeks prior to first visit were enrolled. Zoledronic acid (4 mg) was administered via a 15-minute infusion every 3 or 4 weeks for 12 infusions. Skeletal-related events (SREs) were defined as pathologic bone fractures, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone, radiation therapy to bone, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Primary efficacy end points were the proportion of patients with at least one SRE and the time to first SIZE. Secondary end points included pain, analgesic use, and quality of life. Results. Among 312 patients enrolled, 30% experienced at least one SRE during the 12-month study, and 22% experienced only one SRE. The median time to first SRE was not reached in the intent-to-treat population. Mean pain and analgesic scores declined from baseline, and quality-of-life scores remained stable to study end. The most frequently reported adverse events, regardless of relationship to study drug, were pyrexia (22%) and bone pain (10%). Serum creatinine levels did not significantly increase from baseline throughout the study. Conclusions. Breast cancer patients with newly diagnosed bone metastases who were treated with zoledronic acid had a low incidence of SREs compared with patients who received placebo in randomized phase III trials, and pain was decreased from baseline. This study demonstrated the favorable risk:benefit ratio of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available