3.8 Article

A Community-Based Participatory Health Information Needs Assessment to Help Eliminate Diabetes Information Disparities

Journal

HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 213S-222S

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1524839906288694

Keywords

health information; diabetes; needs assessment; Internet; libraries; community based; participatory research

Funding

  1. NLM NIH HHS [N01-LM-1-3522, N01-LM-1-3521, N01-LM-13515] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [U50/CCU42284-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes the participatory research process, results, action plan, and implications of the community health information needs assessment conducted within the African American community in two South Carolina counties. The REACH 2010: Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition library program is a partnership among community organizations, public and health sciences libraries, and lay community health advisors. A planning committee studied digital divide issues related to health information, designed and implemented a survey, held focus groups, analyzed data, identified needs and assets, and formulated an action plan to increase the dissemination of diabetes information. Key survey findings show that older (older than 60) and less educated (fewer than 12 years of education) African Americans in Charleston and Georgetown counties lack skills to access Internet and library services and suffer disparities in health information. Based on assessment evidence, the community plans to increase Internet access points and provide a train-thetrainer program to teach people skills for using Internet and library resources to get high-quality information about diabetes and its complications. This process taps community resources, builds local capacities and technical skills, educates about health, and empowers participants as active partners in their own health and their community's health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available