4.5 Article

Microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes in mouse bone marrow tissues after ionizing radiation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 7, Pages 511-521

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553000600857389

Keywords

bone marrow; differentially expression; ionizing radiation; P53; SIRT1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To identify differentially expressed genes in mouse bone marrow involved in radiation-induced injury. Materials and methods: Microarray analysis was used to identify the differentially expressed genes and other techniques, e. g., polymerase chain reaction (PCR), western-blotting and antisense were also used to validate the results. Results: DNA microarray analysis demonstrated that the mRNA of 34 genes increased and 69 genes decreased in mouse bone marrow cells (BMC) from C57BL mice 6h after a whole body dose of 6.5 Gy. These differentially expressed genes were involved in a number of processes including DNA replication/repair, proliferation/apoptosis, cell cycle control and RNA processing. In these experiments, a decline of the mammalian homolog Sir2a (an acronym for the silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog [SIRT1]) mRNA accompanied by an increase of P53 protein acetylation was observed in irradiated BMC. To determine whether the reduced SIRT1 is related to the higher acetylation status of P53 after irradiation, we designed and synthesized antisense oligonucleotides (AS) targeting human SIRT1 mRNA. Notably, AS transfection increased tumor protein 53 (P53) protein acetylation and bax-luciferase activity in human bone marrow stromal cell line (HS-5) after radiation. Furthermore, the AS transfer stimulated cell apoptosis in post-irradiation HS-5 cells. Conclusion: Ionizing radiation (IR) affects the expression of a series of genes including genes involved in G1/S transition and the P53 pathway. Among those, reduction of SIRT1 was seen to be involved in transactivation of P53.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available