4.1 Article

Levels of zinc, iron, and copper in patients with pseudoexfoliative cataract

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 548-553

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/112067210601600408

Keywords

Aqueous humor; Atomic absorption spectrometry; Lens; Pseudoexfoliative cataract; Serum; Trace element

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPO S E. To investigate the aqueous humor, lens, and serum concentrations of zinc, iron, and copper in patients with pseudoexfoliative cataract and compare with patients who have senile cataract without pseudoexfoliation. METHODS. Twenty-five patients with pseudoexfoliative cataract and 25 patients with senile cataract as control group were enrolled in the study. Samples from aqueous humor, serum, and lens materials during extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) were collected from all patients. The levels of selected trace elements in three samples in all groups were assayed with atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and statistical analyses were performed with t-test for in dependent samples except lens zinc and serum copper levels. The data weren't normally distributed, therefore Mann-Whitney U test applied for these parameters. RESULTS. The zinc and copper levels in aqueous humor of PEX group were significantly high er than those of control group (p<0.001). The iron levels in aqueous humor were not significantly different in PEX group and control group (p=0.252). The copper content of lenses was significantly increased in PEX group compared to control group (p=0.029). The iron and zinc content of lenses had no significant differences between the two groups (p=0.248, p=0.719, respectively). The levels of iron and copper in serum were significantly increased in PEX group compared to control group (p<0.001 and p<0.002, respectively). The zinc level in serum had no significant differences between the two groups (p=0.823, p=0.472, respectively). CONCLUSIONS. Zinc, iron, and especially copper may play a role in PEX syndrome. (Eur J Oph thalmol 2006; 16: 548-53)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available