4.5 Article

Numerical modelling of low-Reynolds number direct contact condensation in a suppression pool test facility

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 376-387

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.009

Keywords

Two-phase flow; Condensation; CFD; Suppression pool

Funding

  1. European Atomic Energy Community's(Euratom) [323263]
  2. Finnish Nuclear Waste Management Fund (VYR) via The Finnish Research Programme on Nuclear Power Plant Safety SAFIR2014
  3. Academy of Finland via the Doctoral Programme for Nuclear Engineering and Radiochemistry (YTERA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the safety pressure suppression pool systems of Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs), the condensation rate has to be maintained high enough in order to fulfill their safety function. A major part of this condensation occurs as direct contact condensation (DCC), which governs different modes varying from vigorous chugging of collapsing bubbles to mild condensation on almost flat steam-water interface. This paper discusses the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of the latter, low-Reynolds number weak condensation regime. The numerical simulations were performed with two CFD codes, NEPTUNE_CFD and OpenFOAM, in which the DCC phenomenon was modelled by using the Eulerian two-fluid approach of interpenetrating continua without interfacial tracking. The interfacial heat transfer between steam and water was modelled by using the DCC models based on the surface renewal and the surface divergence theories. Flow turbulence was solved by employing the standard k-is an element of turbulence model. The CFD results of this study were validated against the test results of the POOLEX facility of Lappeenranta University of Technology. In the reference test STB-31, the condensation phenomena were limited to only occur on a stable steam-water interface by very low steam mass flux applied and thermal insulation of the blow-down pipe. The simulation results demonstrated that the surface divergence model predicted the condensation phenomena quite accurately both qualitatively and quantitatively while the surface renewal model overestimated it strongly. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available