4.7 Article

In vivo imaging with cellular resolution of bone marrow cells transplanted into the ischemic brain of a mouse

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 958-967

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.019

Keywords

mouse; brain; ischemia; confocal microscopy; fluorescence imaging; stem cells; bone marrow cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to monitor in vivo and noninvasively the fate of single bone marrow cells (BMCs) transplanted into the ischemic brain of unirradiated mice. In vivo imaging was performed through a closed cranial window, throughout the 2 weeks following cell transplantation, using laser-scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy. The window was chronically implanted above the left parieto-occipital cortex in C57BL/6J adult mice. BMC (3 x 10(5) nucleated cells in 0.5 mu L medium) from 5-week-old transgenic mice, ubiquitously expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP), was transplanted into the ipsilateral cortex 24 h after the induction of focal ischemia by coagulation of the left middle cerebral artery (n = 15). Three nonischemic mice served as controls. Repeated in vivo imaging, up to a depth of 200 mu m, revealed that BMCs survived within the ischemic and peri-ischemic cortex, migrated significantly towards the lesion, proliferated and adopted a microglia-like morphology over 2 weeks. These results were confirmed using ex vivo imaging after appropriate immunocytochemical treatments. This study indicates that confocal fluorescence microscopy is a reliable and unique tool to repeatedly assess with cellular resolution the in vivo dynamic fate of fluorescent cells transplanted into a mouse brain. These results also provide the first in vivo findings on the fate of single BMCs transplanted into the ischemic brain of unirradiated mice. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available