4.6 Article

A prospective multicentre study of the nutritional status in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1946-1951

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfl094

Keywords

anthropometry; bioimpedance analysis; children; chronic peritoneal dialysis; malnutrition; nutritional score

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anthropometry-bioimpedance analysis-nutrition (ABN) score is a recently proposed objective method of assessing malnutrition in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) that uses nine parameters based on anthropometry, skinfold thickness and bioimpedance analysis. The aim of this prospective, cross-sectional study was to apply it to children treated with CPD in seven Italian paediatric nephrology centres, with a score of < 10.33 (the 3rd percentile in a population of 264 healthy children) classifying the children as malnourished. The other considered parameters were age, age at the start of dialysis and duration of dialysis; serum haemoglobin, urea, creatinine, total protein, albumin, transferrin, bicarbonate and C-reactive protein; residual urine output; urinary and peritoneal creatinine clearance; and daily protein and energy intake. The study enrolled 43 patients (mean age 10.2 +/- 4.2 years), 21 of whom (48.8%) had an ABN score of < 10.33: 15 with mild, five with moderate, and one with severe malnutrition. The malnourished patients started CPD at a younger age (P < 0.05) and had a longer duration of dialysis (P < 0.01), and a significant worsening in nutritional status was observed in those treated for more than 12 months of dialysis; they also had significantly lower serum albumin, creatinine and haemoglobin levels. In conclusion, protein-calorie malnutrition is common in children receiving CPD. A younger age at the start of dialysis and a longer duration of treatment are clear risk factors, and counterbalance the long-term viability of CPD in paediatric age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available